
On this Earth Day, 17people is strongly encouraging all readers of this blog to join the "we can solve the climate crisis" campaign which has been founded and in many ways funded by Nobel Prize Winner Al Gore.



Bruce Springsteen said during Federici's recent leave of absence:
"Danny is one of the pillars of our sound and has played beside me as a great friend for more than 40 years."[

Dear Friends and Fans:
Like most of you, I've been following the campaign and I have now seen
and heard enough to know where I stand. Senator Obama, in my view, is head and
shoulders above the rest.
He has the depth, the reflectiveness, and the resilience to be our next
President. He speaks to the America I've envisioned in my music for the past 35
years, a generous nation with a citizenry willing to tackle nuanced and complex
problems, a country that's interested in its collective destiny and in the
potential of its gathered spirit. A place where "...nobody crowds you, and
nobody goes it alone."
At the moment, critics have tried to diminish Senator Obama through the
exaggeration of certain of his comments and relationships. While these matters
are worthy of some discussion, they have been ripped out of the context and
fabric of the man's life and vision, so well described in his excellent book,
Dreams of My Father, often in order to distract us from discussing the real
issues: war and peace, the fight for economic and racial justice, reaffirming
our Constitution, and the protection and enhancement of our environment.
After the terrible damage done over the past eight years, a great
American reclamation project needs to be undertaken. I believe that Senator
Obama is the best candidate to lead that project and to lead us into the 21st
Century with a renewed sense of moral purpose and of ourselves as
Americans.
Over here on E Street, we're proud to support Obama for President.
Bruce Springsteen
I am happy that the Boss will be back in the political arena this year and if it is Obama as the nominee I think he will be a big help as he was for John Kerry in 2004 with a much better candidate.
Keep in mind, that Springsteen played to a huge crowd in Wisconsin a few days before the last election where he played "No Surrender" and Kerry won the state by less that 8,000 votes. It may have helped.
You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small
towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's
replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush
administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these
communities are gonna regenerate and they have not.
And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or
religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant
sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their
frustrations.
I was only really ever impressed with Hillary one time.
I don't know if you remember this JC, but Bill was supposed to attend a Christmas party at the Nakatomi Plaza when, unexpectedly, terrorist took over. Hillary had arrived in LA late and so wasn't in the main ballroom when the bad guys struck.
Well, Hillary wasn't going to stand for that, so she launched a one woman all out assault and took those terrorists (who turned out to just be really clever thieves)OUT!
The coolest part was when she used a fire hose to rappel down the side of the building. We need that sort of determination and pluck in our president.
I know a lot of people talk about the time she rescued those two kids from the genetically cloned dinosaurs on Isla Nublar as a standout momment of her first Ladyship, but I think that bit of daring do was pulled off more by the cleverness of Dr. Ian Malcolm than anything she did.
And don't get me started on the time she rallied her fellow gladiators and finally got to take her revenge on the man who had killed her family, the Roman man-god Commodus. Sure, she displayed some excellent leadership skills, but she got killed at the end, and I don't want a zombie President in the White House(again).

My Aunt Cindy, a brilliant writer in her own right, has taught me to support writers and creative TV shows because great writing should be rewarded with viewership.
This principled stand for me is skewed by one thing. I love Reality TV.
Not all of it, but I can get as hooked on a season of Survivor, Big Brother, or Apprentice as anyone. There is something about watching real people show their real colors and character that is a draw to me.
Late last year I stumbled upon The Biggest Loser and since then, with the aid of the writers strike, it has become my number one 'can't miss' show of the week.
When I first heard of the show three or four years ago I thought the worst of it. Figured that it would take advantage of heavy people and do so in a demeaning way. Turned out I was a loser for thinking so. The show is amazing and deals with some of the many issues facing our country, including health, nutrition and obesity.
The transformations are absolutely amazing and one can't help but root for and love the people on the show. In last evenings penultimate episode of the season I was in awe of the progress the remaining participants had made. In last nights weigh-in, the final four contestants lost 51 lbs combined! On any week this would be an amazing amount of weight lost. Yet, if you factor in the fact that these four already lost 401 lbs up to that point of the game, it is unbelievable.
These kind of results are not typical and totally transferable to a normal life. Becasue most people can't take 15+ weeks off to go on a reality show where their job is to workout and eat healthy. This is a totally controlled environment. Yet this is where the show is truly great, it is designed to equip the contestants to be successful when they are not on the "Biggest Loser Campus." There is a lot of 'product placement' in the show, but unlike seeing a fictional character use a mobile phone, on Biggest Loser you see how these products actually work.
Subway, Quaker, Brita, Ziploc, Pam, Extra, are all companies that have made commitments to get into the health market and my guess is that their 'product placement' has been effective. I can say that I have bought or tried all of these products since watching the show, because of the show.
Unlike most other reality shows where there is a lot of gamesmanship and underhanded crap, the Biggest Loser tends to be more pure. There are times where a player or in this case a team 'throws' a weigh in to try and get a threat removed from the game. Yet for the most part the contestants have their health and goals in mind above all else.
The winner of the show gets $250,000, but unlike the other reality shows with a prize, it seems that by the end of the show the money is a much lower priority because the lives of the contestants are so much better than before. And how the winner is determined is not a plot, a campaign, a speech, a vote, or a 'you're hired' from "The Donald."
The final three or four leave the campus and go home for 4-8 weeks and then come back for the live finale. The winner is the person who has had the biggest percentage of weight loss on the scale. The onus is on the individual and their ability to continue their weight loss after they have left the safety of the game.
I have developed a real emotional attachment to the people in the show. I can't help but root for their success and be amazed by the success that they have made. The two trainers on the show are tough and caring at the same time and have changed the lives of these people with their methods and encouragement.
While I usually reserve this blog for issues and politics, I was so moved by the show last night felt that it was worthy of a 1st rate 17people endorsement.
The finale is next Tuesday at 8edt/7cdt on NBC and I guarantee if you watch it you will wish you watched it the whole season.

Hillary said about this meeting:
"It raises questions about Senator Obama coming to Ohioand giving
speechesabout NAFTA and having his chief economic adviser tellthe Canadian
governmentthat it was just political rhetoric."
As anyone who has ever
worked on a campaign knows, your actions will always effect your candidate and
Penn taking this meeting at the time was stupid, especially when considering the
outrage his campaign expressed in the quote above in a similar situation.